Monday, 3 November 2014

A life lived full?

John Mortimer, The Devil's Advocate. The Unauthorised Biography. (2005)
Author: Graham Lord. 

At the spur of the moment, at the last BBW book fair, picked up this hard cover for a song. I thought then it would comprise a collection of landmark legal cases. As it turned out, John Mortimer was a Queen's Counsel alright but he was more well known for his antics outside the courts, namely the theatre and extra matrimonial activities.
Born in England to a barrister father who dealt with divorce cases and eventually became blind, he was enrolled in a boarding school. Unfit to partake in physical activities, he dwell in writing and theatrics. Even though he was initially a shy boy, he overcame his shortage in the looks department with his wit and charm. He became a woman's man. Given the lackadaisical morals of the swinging post war years, he was romping every person with an extra X chromosome.
Whilst still married to Penelope, who was married when they started an affair earlier, he continued his blue bearded lifestyle.
In spite of his active social life, he graduated as a lawyer and be called to the Bar.
His interest in writing continued and he became a prolific writer of screenplays and books. Interestingly, Penelope was an established author. John's affairs brought many unhappiness to his fragile marriage and Penelope brittle psychology. The many upheavals they had in the family was the theme of many of his plays. Actually all the things that are seen in his plays are actually reminiscent of what was happening in his daily life! Masala in real life!
His continued infidelity drove Penelope to brink of insanity. John's idea of marriage is to accept his clandestine romps without batting an eyelid!
His legal work notoriously involved him defending many cases that were deemed to affect morality of the society. He and his generation were accused of decadence of British social mores and decency, hence the title of 'Devil's Advocate'. He successfully defended a thrashy tabloid which published smut for teenagers under the guise of health education. Even Richard Branson and The Sex Pistols were defended by him for an offence related to the use of the work 'bollocks' in their title of the first album. All in the name of right to self expression and freedom of speech.
He also defended Ben Jayakumar, the opposition politician in Singapore.
His marriage ended when he took a pretty young thing as wife who was young enough to be his daughter. Penelope's health took a dive for the worse. His tryst with an actress also produced a love child which he did not acknowledge decades later.
He continued authoring books and screenplays late into his twilight years. His name graced many films and TV dramas over the years.
The author of his biography was denied permission to write after two long interviews. That would explain why the book became an unauthorised version. In a way, the author looked at it as a blessing as he could tell the negative and low-down-dirty aspects of the subject.

Saturday, 1 November 2014

This is what growing old means II

My body is aching all the time. The joints squeak all the time and wobble upon standing erect too long. Every move, every jolt, every drag and every quiver never fail to remind me of my age, my limitations. They say that it is all in the mind. At least, I know I have not lost it!
Oh, I remember those carefree days soon after the war when euphoria filled the air. The Japanese were long gone and we were soon to be an independent nation. We did not know what it meant but we were supposed to happy. We were not complaining, either. We were in the prime of our youth and we ourselves had obtained our own independence from the shackles of a hard childhood.
How we used to swing over trees and jump curled up from the tree branch and jump feet first into the icy cold waterfall water which was my gang's secret hangout. Cuts, bruises and insect bites did not bother us one bit. Wounds literally dry up in days without a scar, without any medical intervention.
That was eons ago when diabetes was an unheard disease and obesity was status symbol of luxury. Now, every knock and a breach in skin surface carries a potential risk of septicemia or gangrene.
Sungai Pinang, Penang Island circa 1957.
Old those bosom buddies have all long left the building. Like a zephyr, news of their demise kept seeping in slowly over the years. In their place are only fond memories and that the occasional reminder that we too once thought we could rule the world. The most we did was rule our own roost and now we slowly had been ruled unfit to be called an 'able body'!
As I lay bed ridden, I have come to realise that this world is only for the young and the young at heart. It is no place for old men, no country for old men. There is no place for old theories. It is an instant gratifying world which preaches instant karma without what the true meaning of karma actually entails.
And..., I drag on....my sorry self....

Friday, 31 October 2014

Hungry in the land of milk and honey?

A place at the table (2012)
On one end, the richest economy (second richest lately) has to deal with obesity and life style related diseases associated with abundance, they also have to deal with a quarter of the population who live with food insecurity. Food insecurity refers to people who are essentially are deprived of balanced nutritious food due to their lack of resources or unsure of their meal at their table!
The problem of hunger in US had been identified as early as the early 1930s, after the Great Depression. The state launched lunch programmes at schools to ensure children's health- to ensure healthy recruits to send to war!
As the years went on, government subsidy went mainly towards corn planters and very little to planters of fruits and vegetables. With the allocation of free food program going mainly towards administration and transportation charges, very little is actually left for food. With the price of nutritious foods escalating, the providers can only provide junk food and sugary drinks - both made cheap by government subsidy.
This documentary goes through the hardship of 3 victims of food insecurity and the crusade of health workers and social workers to go the extra mile to make their plight be heard.
A preteen girl from interior Colorado faces a bleak future as her home is devoid of food and had had gone hungry many times. A single mother from urban Philadelphia with two young kids is juggling between inability to feed her kids, unable to get a job and unable to educate herself because of her dependants. Even when she gets a job, the income is insufficient to support her family and her aid is automatically stopped.
A Mississippi mother is bogged with her morbidly obese son who is inflicted with medical conditions as a result of his weight problem. The type of food that they can are the least healthiest but that is the only thing they can afford.
Even a policeman with a regular job finds it difficult to make ends meet with the ever increasing cost of living.
As the the people in power are caught in a betwixt and between trying to keep their lobbyists happy, small platers are struggling to stay relevant. Distribution of junk food is far superior and can reach all nooks of the country. Religious institutions and soup kitchens feel up the vacuum to feed the hungry mouths.
The 1980s marks the time when this problem started hitting the roof. Healthy food started becoming expensive and junk food became cheaper. The perception of a malnourished person also changed from who appears skin and bones to one with a weighty problem!

Wednesday, 29 October 2014

Sugar, the new cigarette?

Fed up (Documentary; 2014)

I swear that you would not look at a soda drink can the same way after watching this documentary. In the seventies and eighties, having an unusually oversized student in a class was a rare occurrence. Conversely, in the 21st century, it is rare to see a non obese child in class. This subsequently have led to an epidemic of diseases which were only heard in the older adults and for the first time in human history the offspring may die before their parents!
Even though inactivity has been made the bogeyman for this worrying trend, the consensus now that it is our diet, specifically sugar is the main culprit.
There was a time before the Western world discovered the natives of the Caribbean Islands using extracts from a plant to sweet their beverages, food were grown and were healthy. Sugar was a luxury item that only the bourgeoise could savour.
In the seventies, there was a frenzy to reduce our dietary fat intake. That started the chase to reduce fat content of our food. Reduction of fat made our food unpalatable. In order to make it edible, sugar was added. What's more when corn syrup was discovered and the US government began subsidising the corn farmers to increase production.
The school lunch program also was run by big corporations which promoted fast food.
The skimmed milk production produced lots of fat which were cleverly used to make cheese. Suddenly cheese was the latest additive to all food, fast food included. School lunches were laden with cheese. Soda drinks started flooding schools.
Sugar has been to have shown to have the same effect on our brain as cocaine. PET scans has shown our brain to light up like a Christmas tree after an ingestion of sugar laden beverage very much like a shot of cocaine! And its equally addictive.
TV advertisements directed at the younger generation had ignited the desire to consume and indulge incessantly.
When the government cuts in to put things in order, the big corporations steam rolled in to put their brakes, essentially holding the country at ransom. They started accusing them of being a nanny state. The public is asked to demand for their rights to eat and do what they want. They called it a human rights.
In other words, sugar in the 21st century is want the tobacco companies were doing in the 70s. The cigarette companies then categorically denied that cigarettes caused cancer and were promoting smoking as a hyped and cultured thing to do. What sugar is actually doing is leaving a nation full of fatties with diabetes, stroke and needing bariatric surgery at a tender age.
Even when the brain knows the theory, the mind is just too numbed by the lure of the media and its power of persuasion. 

Tuesday, 28 October 2014

Pin drop silence

HOW SOME GREAT PEOPLE HANDLED AWKWARD REMARKS BY GIVING AN APT REPLY TO SILENCE EVEN A MOB!!!!!!

Veer Savarkar once started addressing a public meeting in Hindi at Bangalore. The crowd started shouting "Speak in Kannada. We will hear only in Kannada."
Veer Savarkar replied "Friends, I have spent 14 years of rigorous imprisonment in the infamous Andaman Jail where all freedom fighters were kept in jail. I have learned Bengali from the freedom fighters coming from Bengal , Hindi from those coming from Uttar Pradesh, even Gujarati and Punjabi. Unfortunately there was none from Karnataka from whom I could have learned Kannada."

...and there was pin drop silence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At a time when the US President and other US politicians tend to apologize for their country's prior actions, here's a refresher on how some former US personnel handled negative comments about the United States.
JFK'S Secretary of State, Dean Rusk, was in France in the early 60's when Charles DeGaule, the French President, decided to pull out of NATO.
DeGaule said he wanted all US military out of France as soon as possible.
Rusk responded "does that include those who are buried here?
DeGaule did not respond.

You could have heard a pin drop.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When in England , at a fairly large conference, Colin Powell was asked by the Archbishop of Canterbury if US plans for Iraq were just an example of empire building by George Bush.
He answered by saying, 'Over the years, the United States has sent many of its fine young men and women into great peril to fight for freedom beyond our borders.
The only amount of land we have ever asked for in return is enough to bury those that did not return.'

You could have heard a pin drop.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


There was a conference in France where a number of international engineers were taking part, including French and American. During a break, one of the French engineers came back into the room saying 'Have you heard the latest dumb stunt Bush has done?
He has sent an aircraft carrier to Indonesia to help the tsunami victims. What does he intended to do, bomb them?'
A Boeing engineer stood up and replied quietly: 'Our carriers have three hospitals on board that can treat several hundred people; they are nuclear powered and can supply emergency electrical power to shore facilities; they have three cafeterias with the capacity to feed 3,000 people three meals a day, they can produce several thousand gallons of fresh water from sea water each day, and they carry half a dozen helicopters for use in transporting victims and injured to and from their flight deck. We have eleven such ships; how many does France have?'

You could have heard a pin drop.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


A U.S. Navy Admiral was attending a naval conference that included Admirals from the U.S. , English, Canadian, Australian and French Navies.
At a cocktail reception, he found himself standing with a large group of Officers that included personnel from most of those countries.
Everyone was chatting away in English as they sipped their drinks when a French admiral suddenly complained that, whereas Europeans learn many languages, Americans learn only English.
He then asked, 'Why is it that we always have to speak English in these conferences rather than speaking French?'
Without hesitating, the American Admiral replied, 'Maybe it's because the Brit's, Canadians, Aussie's and Americans arranged it so you wouldn't
have to speak German.'

You could have heard a pin drop.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.......... AND THE FOLLOWING STORY FITS RIGHT IN WITH THE ABOVE ..........drum rolls......

Robert Whiting, an elderly US gentleman of 83, arrived in Paris by plane.
At French Customs, he took a few minutes to locate his passport in his carry on.
"You have been to France before, monsieur?" the customs officer asked sarcastically.
Mr. Whiting admitted that he had been to France previously.
"Then you should know enough to have your passport ready."
The American said, 'The last time I was here, I didn't have to show it."
"Impossible. Americans always have to show your passports on arrival in France!"
The American senior gave the Frenchman a long hard look.
Then he quietly explained, ''Well, when I came ashore at Omaha Beach on D-Day in 1944 to help liberate this country, I couldn't find a single Frenchman to show a passport to."

You could have heard a pin drop.

Sunday, 26 October 2014

Modern parental dilemma!

Now, they even have parenting classes for fear that the parents fail in their endeavour to pave the correct way for their children to reach adulthood. The fear of not bringing out the full potential is reaching dizzying heights as the number of offspring in the family dwindles. Their desire to ensure the continuity of good life is understandable.
Above all, the parents are afraid that their children would one day, God forbid, attribute all their failures in life to their 'dysfunctional' upbringing. 'Dysfunctional' according their juniors and modern psychological definition.
If your parents and their parents thought 'Spare the rod and spoil the child' was the panacea of all indiscipline, do that and find all the SWAT personnels pointing their weapons at your face. Your hugs and touches will be deemed inappropriate and you will listed as a predator. Your absence from important life events would torment your child's childhood so much that they would be stunted psychologically and would encounter issues with commitment. Your lack in dominance in the family decision may attribute to their indecisiveness in life. And the complains keep on piling.
But then nobody talks of lack of drive on the part of the young ones.
When you have nothing and every living day is a question mark and you live hand to mouth and you are left to rot, instantaneous motivation and zest to succeed will snowball from nowhere!

Friday, 24 October 2014

Time tells a different story

Thrilla in Manila (2008, HBO documentary)
They say that nature is a violent creature. There is plenty of evidence that shows that the forces of Nature are both brutal and murderous. Its damage can be mammoth. It has no sympathy for the weak-hearted and even the righteous. It is a necessary evil that ensures only the best survives. Man can be equally inhumane. Over generations, the will to survive as a species has ensured that only the strongest survive. A reflection of our violent past is seen in the society sanctioned a display of legal murderous intent of boxing. Here two individual are put on display to knock each other blind as many around them prosper in more ways than one.

We grew up at a time when a live telecast of boxing could paralyse a nation. In the 70s when live broadcast was new, a boxing match held half a globe away was a national event, especially one involving the World Heavyweight Championship, specifically one involving Muhamad Ali. The greatest boxing fights of all time is the one involving the two greats of the ring, Muhamad Ali and Joe  Frazier. Their fights went beyond the ring. It started as a friendship when Ali refused to serve in the US Army in Vietnam for his religious belief. Frazier petitioned with the courts and President Nixon for Ali to be allowed to box when his licence was withdrawn for his refusal.

Suddenly, things changed when they were arranged to fight in a bout. Therein started the mortal animosity and the trilogy of Ali-Frazier classic fights.
After an eventful first fight and a not so eventful second fight, the two pugilists were drawn at one fight each; Frazier winning the first and losing meekly in the second. With such a curtain-raiser, the stage was laid for a final showdown.

The Philippines with its internal turmoil, a flamboyant dictator and communist uprising, Marcos decided to divert the attention of his subjects by upstaging an extravagant boxing match to showcase to the world of the greatness of this backwater country. 
History has shown that such an event happens all the time to make people feel good about their country and forget the fact that they are being shortchanged.
Ali-Frazier's fight has always been sold by Ali as a fight between the whites and newly emerging Black Power Afro-American community of America. Ali with his affliction with the Nation of Islam and his newfound religion is the voice the blacks whilst Frazier, who was financed by mostly white bankers is a reflection of the old.

Ali as a build-up to the fights called Frazier with derogatory terms like ugly, gorilla and 'Uncle Tom'. 'Uncle Tom' refers to a subservient black slave of the slave trade era who would 'sell' his own race for the comfort of the white masters. Ali continued tormenting Frazier with his antics even at Frazier's training ground. The media had a field day covering all these thrashy news and the stage was slowly set for the showdown.

The contest's name is derived from the frequent rhyming boast made by Ali that the fight would be a 'killa and a thrilla and a chilla, when I get that gorilla in Manila'. A song about Ali even made it to charts.

Even Ali's philandering lifestyle came to fore to spice up the event. During a formal state function, Ali's African girlfriend Ms Porsche was introduced as his wife to President Marcos. Upon viewing this televised event in the US, Ali's real wife, Belinda, scurried to Ali's hotel to show her discontent to the glee of running cameras!
For Frazier's credit, he was a cool cat. Despite all the heckling and the intimidations, he never retaliated.

The fight proved to be a well-awaiting clash of two Titans. A 6'3" Ali and a 5'11" Frazier who just would not bow to each other and refuse to fall. Visibly exhausted fighters soldiered on past 12 rounds - Ali almost at the brink of collapse and Frazier blinded at both eyes. Frazier later confessed that he had actually been fighting with sight only from his right eye. A 1964 training accident blinded his left! Imagine a blind man punching aimlessly without surrender. Ali, at the 14th round, was begging for his trainer to 'cut his gloves' but he refused. Frazier, on the other hand, was still rearing to go with a puffed-up face. 

Unfortunately, the Filipino umpire, who himself was a fill-in umpire as the regular umpires were deemed too controversial for the fight, stopped the fight. Frazier's trainer threw in the towel. He had seen enough men die on the canvass. There would be another day, another fight. Unfortunately, they were not to be. The fight scarred both men and it did irreparable damage to their bodies and they were never the same again. The differences between the boxers were nerve resolved and Frazier took his grudges to the grave. Ali apologised to Frazier's family about his misconduct, quoting that it was all part of the marketing of their boxing duel. 

What wakes you up?