Allah, Liberty and Love (2011)
Author: Irshad Manji

Thanks to the religious authorities of Malaysia, this book received free publicity after the seizure of its Malay translation. This author was almost unknown when the English version was out in the Malaysian bookstores. The moment the Malay version hit the shelf, all hell broke loose. That, in turn, drew many a curious mind to delve into her work.
Manji is an unabashed Muslim lesbian who drew many a flak from professors of the religion. She is quite comfortable with her sexual orientation and has no qualms in practising her belief as she sees fit. The purists, however, are up in arms, literally with her as they believe that unconventional sexual practices are condemned to the highest order in the scriptures. As the sole purpose of conjugal relations is procreation, to them, same sex relationships are a no-no. Period. Based on this point alone, all her intelligent arguments are rejected wholesale.
Manji is one the preachers along the line of Mu'tazilas who teach people to use their thinking faculty, ijtihad, before accepting anything into their belief systems. She encourages people to build the moral courage to voice out what they believe in and not to be cowed into submission without an intellectual discourse. Most religions in the world are happy to have its congregations to be uniform in their thinking, practice and acceptance of a standard set of rules of what is right and what is not. They look at uniformity as unity, engaging in debates as divisive and that division is heresy. The need to conform had numbed the moral courage to stand for oneself.
She argues that freedom of religion is not a Western construct as King Cyrus of Persia is said to be the first monarch to allow religious freedom. None of the modern values that are hailed by the younger generations is Western in origin. All good values are interrelated just like how Gandhi got his idea of passive resistance from Henry Thoreau (an American poet philosopher who authored 'On the Duty of Civil Disobedience'), as for how Emerson was inspired by the Eastern wisdom and Martin Luther King Jr planned his fight against racial segregation from Gandhian ideology.
From her writings, I find her to very smart and knowledgeable of many areas of interests. Unfortunately, some of my Muslim friends utterly reject her rhetorics, saying that she is ignorant of her facts. Sadly, they accuse her of tarnishing the good name of the religion and copping out to its enemies.
She makes a distinction between culture and faith, a trait blurred in today's practice of the faith. A person does not have to follow a particular culture to profess a religion. Culture is human-made, not God-given but religion is a divine relationship between human and his Maker. We should also accept that no one is perfect. We all err in our day to day practice. Just as we are offended by others in our daily duties, we must take care not to hurt others. We are quick to blame others for our misfortunes without, for once, reflecting upon our shortcomings and faults.
As uniformity is an important aspect of the religion, just like the five pillars of the faith, I can understand why some of my friends are upset with her views. She is quite happy with her unorthodox method of praying and frequency of prayers in a day. She also highlights particular cherry picking of verses from the Holy Book without highlighting other contradictory ones. Then there are the 'Satanic Verses'!
An interesting verse I picked up from the book is by Martin Luther King Jr, "If a man had nothing to die for, then he is not fit to live." Funny how this verse can be picked by the morally and ethically vacuous jihadist to meet his course just as much as Manji uses it to stir moral courage to voice out their convictions! Everything is just perspective.