Showing posts with label censorship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label censorship. Show all posts

Monday, 25 December 2023

Apartheid in pipeline?

Pendatang (Malaysian Cantonese, Malay, Newcomer; 2023)
Director: Ken-Kin Ng

In the old days, most houses will have a single bathroom. Two, if you are in the upper middle class. Bedrooms were hardly to go by, usually reserved for the female members of the family for modesty. The males would usually rough it out wherever there was space. This was especially so when relatives visited the household. Everywhere they lay their pillow, it was a sleeping place. 


Fast forward to 1990 and beyond. Even siblings find it difficult to share living space. They talk about wanting personal space and wanting privacy. The concept of her sharing and accommodation for a fellow roommate or a sibling has suddenly become an alien concept. Hell hath no fury for a person whose personal toiletry or cosmetics are used without consent. 


Outside the confines of the home, we were a tolerant lot. We did not tolerate but instead accepted each other with each other's idiosyncratic ways of eating or worshipping. There was no concept of one ethnicity dominating one area over another. No doubt there were majorities, but each just accepted the other. Nobody claims an area to be theirs, even if there were the majority. 


We had Indians in Kampong Melayu, Malays in New Villages, Chinese in rubber estates, etc. In the 1980s, we saw townships with a particular ethnic flavour. Shah Alam and later Putrajaya claim to be Malay-centric and refuse to exhibit 'features' or engage in businesses that go against the grain of Islam. The local councils barred the sale of alcoholic beverages and the opening of pubs and nightclubs. Slowly, everybody developed a 'holier than thou' attitude of themselves. 


Now, in 2023, even illegal immigrants who had somehow stayed undetected below the radar for years have risen to the occasion. The Rohingyas, Myanmarese, and Bangladeshis have all claimed their pieces of the pie. After congregating at certain localities around the country and developing them by their standard through business and occupation, they claim legitimate ownership of those places. 


Naturally, the self-proclaimed princes of the soil would not take any of these. Their leaders, whose mental capacity never grew after the 1960s, used racist and religious catchphrases to bulldoze their agenda through small-minded straw man arguments. The trouble is the people who matter most opt for peace rather than combat bigotry at its core. The future looks bleak. 


This film imagines a dystopian Malaysia where an enactment is passed to ensure races are kept separated. It becomes a crime to interact with or harbour a person of a different ethnicity. The race felt that that would preserve the sanctity of the race, but it was a bitter pill they had to swallow. To ensure conformity to the rule of law, there is a group of ragtag vigilantes. 


A Chinese family moves on into a traditional Malay house. Unbeknownst to them, a young Malay girl is spotted hiding in the ceiling and scavenging their food. 


After some initial trepidation, the family decides to care for her, much to the wrath of the junta, which came for a home inspection. Next to follow is a series of escapes from this hell hole to a neighbouring country. 


Something obvious amongst the high-level officials and mega businessmen is that the segregation law does not apply to them. A Chinese factory owner is married to a Malay girl, and a Malay politician is seen making business deals with the Chinese. 

The take-home here really is that each race needs the other, and they have no ill feelings towards the other. In their lust to stick on to power and usurp money, the politicians and leaders create a non-existent bogeyman to create fear, divide and rule. It worked for the British then and will work for present-day East India Company 2.0, run by the country's own son of the soil.

The Klang Valley and the nationalities who claim stake.




Sunday, 4 June 2023

The suppressed memories?

Censor (2021)
Written and directed: Prano Bailey-Bond

Memory can be as much a boon or a curse to humankind. The race has progressed thus far because we can learn and put into memory what we have learnt. With that ability, we can reproduce it as and when needed. 

But then, therein lies the problem. Keeping other memories, especially the unpleasant ones and those affecting the matters of the heart, can be unsettling and counterproductive. Just for how long one wants to hold a grudge for hurt caused? Does anger have an expiry date, upon which scores are cleared dry on the slate?

That is why our mind has an in-built pruning mechanism to cut off unpleasant memories that can stunt our progress. Sadly, a small group of people do not forget or forgive. They must be the most unhappiest of the people on the planet. Perhaps, the next serial killer too!

Even at best, Man uses less than 10% of his brain connexions. Scientists are perplexed by the many dormant areas of the brain and wonder if they form part of the remnants of our reptilian brain. Will they recoil to provoke primal reactions in the wake of provocation? Like domesticated animals, are we trained to behave? Or are we inherently evil, waiting for the ripe moment to pounce and assume the goriest forms of our inner selves? Testimonials of these are apparent in court documents of our crimes. Is evil inherent, or is it a learnt experience? Can we blame literature and films for this? Is there a need for a nanny to supervise what we see and read? Do we need censorship? Is it not that Nature cruel enough? History has picturised humans as animals who would do anything for food, wealth, mate and power.

There was a time in the 80s with the sea of VHS tapes and nasty mind-numbing meaningless gory horror films. There was a call in the UK for stricter censorship of these films. The problem arose when a man mimicked a scene from one of these horror movies when he killed his wife. Enid, a diligent worker in the British Film Board of Censors, is singularly blamed for approving the film to be screened. In reality, Enid takes it upon herself as a moral guardian and is strict in controlling the element of gore in movies. In reality, the husband had never seen the movie to mimic the killing technique. He did it out of his frustration.

Enid has a dark past in her childhood. Her sister went missing when Enid and her sister, Nina, were playing at the edge of a forest. Nina was never found as information about Nina's disappearance was fuzzy as Enid could not accurately explain what happened.

While reviewing one particular film, the florid memories of her suppressed past come alive. It was about two sisters and getting lost in a jungle. Enid's interest is piqued. She suspects the movie's director had something to do with her sister's disappearance. Enid soon goes into a frenzy, assuming many things and going berserk as she puts two and two together.

This movie is said to be as exciting as 'The Blair Witch Project' when it came out, i.e. before we found out the whole footing was staged. Initially, 'The Blair Witch Project' kicked up a storm when it was marketed as lost footage of some college students searching for some spirit in a jungle. The students were missing, but their camcorder was found, and the raw footage was made into a movie. It took the living daylights off me and remained one of my best horror films.
!--Go to www.addthis.com/dashbo

Friday, 15 September 2017

My way, your way or the right way?

An Insignificant Man (2017)
Director: Khushboo Ranka & Vinay Shukla


Another highlight of the Malaysian Freedom Film Festival is the screening of the biopic of a taxman who decided to change the landscape of politics after a bitter event in the course of his work. Arvind Kejriwal, at a time when Anna Hazare started fasting to make people realise the widespread of corruption in Indian politics, started a new political party by the name of Aap Aadmi Party (AAP). Using the logo of a broom as its party symbol, he had hoped to clean Indian politics. Much to everybody's astonishment, this newbie did manage to oust the long-standing Chief Minister of Delhi, Sheila Dixit of the Congress Party.

This documentary tells in a much convincing manner, the trials and tribulations of an everyday man who is a greenhorn to the mind-boggling world of politics in his single-minded zest to fight cancer the society. He comes to realise that it is not easy to change the society. The community, at large, has come to terms that the system is unscrupulous. Rather than fighting an unwinnable battle against an unassailable enemy, they have resigned to the fact it is more beneficial just to embrace the wrong-doings rather than change the status quo.

Kejriwal, through his unrelenting spirit and with his selection of a trustworthy band of social reformers, managed to single-handedly shatter the idea that only wealthy politicians with past track records and connections with the two major political parties can win the election. With his single gesture, he changed the political landscape of India forever.

Unfortunately, the noblest of intentions also meet resistance. His long standing 'generals' and 'doyens' of the party parted ways along the way. It only goes on to show that life is a zero-sum game. Gains on one side is the loss of the other. No single action is all-good or all-wrong. There are always merits and demerits in any action. The best course of action is the composite of one which the best to the most. In the course of action, there are bound to be resentment and retaliation. At the end of these objections would hopefully propel the human race to a higher level of culture, evolution and wisdom.

WhatsApp conferencing with the director.
The film is plagued with legal wrangles and censorship problems.

“Be afraid. Be very afraid.”*