Monday, 22 February 2021

Wisdom is found when you step out of the shadows and into the light.

My Story: Justice in The Wilderness
Author: Tommy Thomas.

This book has generated so much publicity, even from people who have not managed to read it. Its sales have soared tremendously, selling off the shelves like hotcakes and has gone into multiple reprints in such a short time. The speed at which police reports were registered almost days after the book's release exposed Malaysian readers' voraciousness. Whether these people actually read the book is another question altogether.

Over the years, Malaysians have realised that rumours carry more weightage than the official narrative. Coffee-shop talks invariably turn up to be accurate, despite all denials. This book just affirms all of the above.

In my opinion, this book can be described as a logbook of a person who had completed his tour de force which he considered a national service for his country. He was given a mandate by the people to perform a task, and this is his way of saying this is what he did and what he failed to do. His report also describes what he found during his mission and the dead-ends that he could not overcome. A tinge of nostalgia can be seen as he narrates Malaysia's history that he grew in, his background, and the man behind the post of Attorney General of Malaysia.

For most Malaysians, what is described in the book is nothing new. We all know about it but just too courteous to squeal. Many did not want to rock the boat for fear of repercussions. We bicker and whine amongst friends, but the buck ends there. We do not utter this in polite company. As long as they can earn a living comfortably, like the cowardice German intellectuals Niemöller referred to, we do not confront the dragon. 

My civil service experience showed me there is ample opportunity to improve one’s capabilities, which would benefit the public. The only thing that seems to be the stumbling block could have been the individual’s inertia or the comfort of his safe zone. If one is engrossed in serving the public and making a mark, as public servants are supposed to do, i.e., to serve the people, he would be too short of time. Work is never finished, but the quality of work needs to be assessed periodically. 

When TT highlighted the numerous areas that AG’s office was deficient, many got hot under their collars/robes. For example, when Equanimity had to retrieve from Indonesian waters, TT realised that his office had a dearth of experience dealing with Maritime legal procedures. It is not that there is no such expertise here in Malaysia. Only that the AGC did not seem to keep up with the changes. 

With TT’s good office, he managed to get the correct people for the job, and it turned out favourable to the people of Malaysia. If one noticed from the book, many counsels from the private sector are more than willing to go pro bono for the country. 

One of the main gripes of the far right-wing of society on TT’s tenure is his alleged ‘handling’ of Adib's death, the firefighter. This book is a canvas for TT to show his side of the story where his job was to help set a coroner’s tribunal and aid them with the necessary information. 

The last thing that TT would be guilty of his racism and denigration of a particular society's ethnicity. He clearly calls a spade a spade. He gave due when it was and did not mince his words when he saw deficiencies. 

From my reading, TT’s 22 months’ tenure at the helm of the highest legal advisor to Malaysia's Government is a short-lived dream. In the pitch of darkness that the Malaysian were enduring pre-GE 14, we had a plan. It came through. During REM sleep, at a time of bliss, came a dream with the hope of a better tomorrow, the bubble popped. The bark of a distant dog shook us from that slumber. We were brought to the ground to realise that our neighbourhood was bountiful with many dogs and dog owners' paranoia that their property will be broken into. They do not mind the occasional ugly encounters with their beast or the occasional litter they drop around the housing estate. And we stay awake for the rest of the night.  

Like in the cave allegory, we build our own echo chamber, self-aggrandising our perceived achievements. If we stay too long in the cave, the light may be too blinding for us to accommodate that we may recoil into the kingdom of one-eyed-Jack or the blind for validation.

                                                                       
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Follow

Saturday, 20 February 2021

A balancing act!

The Crown (Miniseries, S1-S4; 2016-present)
Netflix

I had been resisting the urge to immerse myself into another miniseries for so long. But, no thanks to DKLA's persistent persuasion and continually dangling the proverbial carrot that British history was intertwined in its storyline, I caved in. It did not disappoint but instead turned out to be quite an informative and educational one, actually. It is a sort of a history revision for me, of course, from a colonial perspective and the one which puts the British Crown above all.

Throughout the whole series, the Damocles' sword that seems to be hanging over the royalties is the fear that they might be ousted at any time. The idea of a single-family, through lineage, ordained by God to rule over his subjects cannot be swallowed by the common man anymore. The nearest they can get to this by being the leader of the Church. Even then, the Crown members' behaviours were neither Christian-affirming nor exemplary for the subject to emulate.

Their contemporaries the world over, one by one, seems to be shown the exit door, sometimes unceremoniously.  Just look at Prince Philip, who had to be smuggled out of Greece in an orange crate to escape an angry mob. What started as hungry French peasants demanding bread but were given cakes instead slowly led to the brutal killing of Rasputin and the annihilation of the Romanov family. Monarchs in Asia, Africa and the rest of Europe were dropping like flies in the 60s, which added much to their anxiety. The challenge faced by the Windsor castle occupants was just that -  to stay relevant with the times. The idea of the Crown filling the intermediary gap between God and people is laughable when every human being is supposed to be created equal. Why then do royalties earn a special place in society, placed on a pedestal and demanding courtesies, the people ask? 

This thoroughly researched miniseries starts with Philip taking a new surname, Mountbatten, after renouncing his Danish and Greek nationalities. He is related to Admiral Louis Mountbatten, the Viceroy of India. Philip is inducted into British royalty with his marriage to Elizabeth in 1947. 

Prince Philip @ Duke of Edinburgh
had no problem kneeling before his wife.

King George VI's reluctant ascent to the throne in 1936 as the Crown's head and the British Commonwealth came about when his brother, King Edward VIII, thought love was more important than the Crown. He abdicated his throne when the Crown decided that there is no place for a divorcee in the royal household. Edward's beau was an American twice divorced with two living ex-husbands. This situation was deemed inappropriate for a queen consort as the King was the head of the Church of England, and divorce was socially not accepted in Britain at that time. The story often rolls back to Edward and Simpson's back story and their shenanigans from their exclusive chateaux in France. I suppose, with the liberty of creative licence and the need for dramatisation, the scriptwriters have also painted Simpson as a German spy. In reality, the exposè of Marburg files highlighted the cosy relationship between Edward and Hitler. There was an elaborate to reinstate Edward as King after a German victory over Britain.

Every episode brings one or two so-called controversies that rocked the public imaginations in the 60s. In real life, they were mere storms in a teacup. The Queen and her band of minders averted any bad press. During the Profumo affair with a young model who in turn was linked to a Russian naval ataché, Philip is mentioned to be a fellow attendee of their wild parties.

Churchill is portrayed as a farsighted statesman who built a fantastic working relationship with the Queen. Being a politician, his masters are British and the Crown, not the starving peasants in the rest of the world. Even the mighty Churchill is not infallible as bungled up with handling the 1952 Great London Smog. He erroneously attributed inefficiency as an 'act of God'.

Talking about Prime Ministers, the idea of having a PM started in the reign of non-English speaking King George I in the early 18th century. After messing up with the South Sea Company, which hails across the Atlantic Ocean delving in a myriad of trades, including slaves, he appointed an astute businessman, Robbert Walpole, to sort out the mess. The job continued as the PM post, and the tradition dictated that he should have a weekly audience with the monarch. Interesting that they were many non-English speaking rulers who ruled Britain. Even as late as 1917, the royal family's surname was 'Saxe-Coburg-Gotha'. Due to anti-German sentiments at that time, the family name was changed to Windsor. Philip's sisters were not on the royal wedding's list as they were Nazi party members.

In the first two seasons with both the Queen and Philip in the prime of their youth, we see the Queen immersing deep into overseeing the 'ruling' of the country whilst Philip absorbed into his role of a royal house husband. His secretive boys' outings at the Thursday Club and long weekend outings portray Philip as a philandering husband. A particular Russian ballerina is mentioned as 'the other' (or rather one of many others) woman. His shenanigans came to light after his 1954 world cruise aboard Royal Yacht Britannia when his best friend Mike's estranged wife got hold of some evidence of their mischief.

A memorable episode is the mining disaster in Aberfan, Wales, which claimed 116 children and 28 adults. The CGI looks so believable. 

Talking about following royal decorum, Queen Elizabeth's sister, Margaret, has been the subject of many embarrassments. Starting off with an affair with a married man at a young age, she had to sacrifice her beau in place of losing her sovereign benefits. A party animal and a sort of person who finds comfort amongst the plebeians, her consort turned out to be one with an illustrious extramarital prowess. As is depicted in this series, Margaret's magnum opus could be how she smoothened UK-US strained relationships after Edward Heath refused to support US entry into Vietnam. 

JFK is portrayed here as an insecure person who is apprehensive of Jackie's popularity. Maybe the Malaysian public did not notice that the series poked fun at the Malayan royalty in the earlier season. The British royal couple were seen showing around Buckingham palace to a Malayan aristocrat who seems to be going on and on about their courts back home. Queen and Philip sat exhaustedly in the next scene, saying, "I thought they will never stop!"

Another remarkable episode is about the Apollo 11 astronauts. Philip, being a licenced pilot, was fascinated with the Apollo mission. He invited Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins to the palace. He thought of getting a philosophical view of the whole expedition and a first-hand account of their heroism.  He was into an existential crisis of sorts. What he saw, instead, were young technicians who were more concerned with protocols, the task at hand, ticking off the checklist and down with flu; not enlightened men with answers about life.

Spitting image?
Iron Lady and Jillian Anderson

The climax of all seasons so far must surely be Margaret Thatcher's role, who was played convincingly by Jillian Anderson in Season 4. Viewers can understand the obstacles that one has to go through to lead a country. For those who hail Thatcher as a feminist, you are wrong. She probably believes in women empowerment and that the fairer sex should grab opportunities that come their way. Her cabinet had no women. When asked about the absence of female representation, she merely replied, "Oh, they are too emotional!"

Politics is not for the faint-hearted. One needs to learn to juggle many roles, wear many hats, listen when needed, and sometimes make unpleasant decisions. 

The screenwriters did not ink Prince Charles in a favourable light. He appears to be a moody, sentimental insecure fool who seems run to Camella Bowles's skirt for assurance that he never got from his mother. His liaison his Mrs Bowles predates his marriage. Conveniently, he blames all his miseries on his absent father. The saga will continue with two more seasons with a switch of casts.

Coming from a country with nine Sultans and a rotating post for a King, the answer to how the Malaysian royalty remained relevant all through the years may lie within this miniseries' storyline. Our royalty is even older than the British Crown if we start counting from the reign of Parameswara of the Malacca Sultanate in 1403. Through feuds, intrusions, pirate attacks, Siamese and Chinese hegemony, colonial invasions, the World Wars, and the post-colonial uprisings, it still commands respect through the years. The British exerted their dominance over the administration, and the Japanese terrorised with their brutality and torture tools, but they came out smelling of roses.

Life, despite the occasional doubt on their relevance, is unthinkable without them to many. Their importance is enshrined in the Rukun Negara (National Principles). Their role as a buffer in the balancing act between politicians may be a testimony of this.

Follow

Follow

Follow

Follow

Follow

Wednesday, 17 February 2021

Make up your mind and move on...

Waiting for Godot (play, book)
Writer: Samuel Beckett

Thanks to MEV for the suggestion; for helping me in my journey to crack open my hard shell of ignorance. 

Albert Camus and Samuel Beckett fall into the same category of philosophers-writers who lived through World War 2-ravaged France to build a very nihilistic view of life's purpose. Samuel Beckett, an Irishman, who spent a good portion of his life in France, can be credited to have started the 'theatre of absurdism' and received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1969 for his books and drama.

The life that is laid in front of us is apparently meaningless. In this tragi-comic play, we are shown as headless chickens running, not knowing what to do and not knowing what is expected of us. We are so fickle, always losing track of our purpose and get swooned over easily by events around us. We eagerly await instructions from people in authority without an iota of a clue about the right thing to do. But we wait and follow like sheep, correctly or otherwise.

The play narrates a conversation between two tramps, Vladimir and Estragon, who await mysterious Godot's arrival. It seems that Godot is very elusive, does not keep to his word and has no qualms keeping his men waiting. Vladimir and Estragon, in their endless wait, have to do things to pass the time. They encounter Pozzo, a rich man, and his slave, Lucky, who traverse their path. They realise that their miserable lives are much better than that of the slave, but still, they are unhappy. They keep on waiting for Godot hoping to get instructions from him.

That is life as we know it. We are clueless about why we are here, why we are alive, what is our mission. We create stories trying to justify our existence. We are not convinced and need validation from someone, anyone. We grope in the dark, making along. This aimless journey is so long and arduous.  

Like Sisyphus, we are cursed to be doing the same repetitive unending chore. The boulder pushed with so much exertion, and determination just rolls down just as it hits the pinnacle. His job is repeated and repeated yet again. Sisyphus can just call it a day and call it quits. Sisyphus knows he is destined to do throughout his life. He has to find happiness and purpose in life within that miserable ordeal. Life is tough, but he has to find joy and fulfilment within that wretched circumstances. 

Looking at this paradigm, we can distract ourselves into doing things that take our mind off of what happens at the end of it all. The indulgence in primal pleasures, intoxicants, flesh and music remain possible options. One desirable alternative could be the dissipation in art forms. It numbs the pain but at the same time, open up the mind to gaze at our lives from different perspectives. We can be leaders and serve society or delve deep into science to uplift mankind. The bottom line is that this is our existence, we have to accept it and make sense of it all and make our own conclusion.

Follow

Follow

Follow

Follow

Sunday, 14 February 2021

You are more than what you eat!

The Great Indian Kitchen (Malayalam; 2021)

After being denied by many OTT channels, because of the Sabarimala Trials' running narration in the background, it made its presence in an obscure platform, NeeStream in Kerala.

No, this is not a cooking show showcasing the numerous mouth-watering cuisines from the Indian kitchens. Instead, it is an India bashing film to portray the slave-like conditions in which some Indian brides live as 24/7 cook, wife, servant, and gardener. Simultaneously, in this particularly orthodox Hindu household, she is locked away in a small room away from everybody view for a good one week every month. She is considered dirty and should not be allowed to prepare food, as it is regarded as a divine duty to feed the family's males. 

Coming from a family with liberal views on women empowerment (the protagonist was a traditional dancer in a previous life!), she flips one day. She was done with making adjustments to fit in every time. She called it quits and resumes her former life as a Bharat Natyam teacher.

Surprisingly, female gender had been typecast to play second fiddle in a typified patriarchal society. What happened to the likes of Ubhaya Bharati who had been given the honour of judging a philosophical discourse between Adi Shankara and her husband Mandana Mishra circa 700AD.  When her husband was outclassed by Adi Shankara, she debated with the latter.  

The Vedic society gave equal place for women in society. Pāṇini, 400BCE, the Master Sanskrit Grammarian, advocated women to study the Vedas equally with men. In his Mimamsa School of Philosophy, there were women philosophers. Mahabharata tells of polyandry and strong female characters. What gave? Did the meddling of Indian education by the British and Abrahamic religions dismantle an already functional traditional education system?

Many traditional societies view menstruation as unclean body fluid, and many restrictions are attached to it. 

Sinu Joseph, an engineer by qualification and a menstrual educator, has researched much into traditional Indian outlook and tries to give an Ayurvedic scientific explanation to the body during that time of the month.

According to the agama shastras, each temple is designed to energise a specific chakra. By extension, each temple can have a particular impact on the body, and even a different effect on the male and female body. 

This is also used to explain why menstruating women have been barred entry into temples. Traditionally, temples have been looked upon as, not as a place of worship, but as charging pods. Its location concerning magnetic forces of the Earth, its alignment, geometry and placing certain metals within its building makes it an opportune place for sojourners to rejuvenate themselves to meet the challenges of the day. A menstruating body has many internal hormonal circuits to handle, and entering such an institution may have a different impact on the internal milieu. According to the agama shastras, that the author cites several times in her book, each temple is designed to energise a specific chakra. By extension, each temple can have a distinct impact on an individual.  Different restrictions have been placed by other worship houses to a targeted group of the population, i,e, ladies in the reproductive age group and restricted entry into the Sabarimala temple. There are even temples exclusively for women! Men are disallowed here. Talk about a reverse Sabarimala, but nobody talks about it.

Follow

Follow

Follow

Follow

Follow

Follow

Follow

A hidden family secret!