Thursday, 3 May 2018

A monster too big to leash?

The Creature from Jekyll Island (1994)
Author: G. Edward Griffin

No, this is not some kind of sci-fiction about a radioactive exposed and mutated creature that lurks in the vicinity of Jekyll Island. This book is, of the non-fiction variety, and it talks about our banking system. In fact, it tells of the devious manner that it operates. It was on this island that the monster called Federal Reserve System was created.

Jekyll Island is a real island off the coast of Georgia. In 1910, a group of seven individuals of politicians and bankers gathered in a holiday resort to discuss the future of banking in America. Together, they possessed a quarter of the world's wealth then. Earlier, at the beginning of the century, Americans had become wary of their banking system and did not trust bankers to handle their money. The purpose of this extremely secret meeting was to create the blueprint of the Federal Reserve System. Note the absence of bank in its name and the authentic sound of its title. At one look the intentions look noble, but when we scrutinise its whole setup, we can smell a rat. The entire operation was shrouded in secrecy as the American public wanted the bankers to be the last person given the responsibility of taking care of their money. In the not-so-distant American past then, many financial institutions had sprung up and followed in the line of customers being fleeced off their hard-earnings.

It was a covert operation for a group of European bankers, who had links with magnates like the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and JP Morgan and had a stronghold in the dealings of the world economy. Despite America's previous bad experiences with unregulated paper money, the USA decided to follow the very same path. That was the beginning of fiat money where wealth is made out of thin paper with no intrinsic value to the currency. It was built on the trust that people would take the money for its face value. It operates under the assumption that the public would not, all at once, demand back their deposits in cash.

The setup is like this. When the Congress needs money, it goes to the Treasury. The Treasury would not have money. Together, we would march to the Federal Reserve System (FRS). The FRS would issue a cheque for a certain sum (of money that it does not have). This paper money makes its way to the banks to be loaned. The banks can loan out up to 90% of the funds it received (which is non-existent) to customers who would repay with interest. In other words, the lay people are taxed to work to pay for the money that was created from nothing to run the whole system. The by-product of this entire exercise to finance the banking system and to fatten bankers.

Every now and then, the whole bubble would go burst when inflation sets in as the value of money dwindle as there is a lot of money circulating. To offset this, the banking system makes the taxpayers pay more taxes or decrease the interest rate for them to borrow more. The whole setup is based on credit.

The author, G. Edward Griffin, is a renowned conspiracy theorist who goes on to link the operation of the FRS to many of mishaps that happen around us. War and political upheavals spur economic activities which are, of course, beneficial to the bankers. Loans need to be taken.

Even as early as the American Civil War, financiers had the bad habit of financing both sides of the warring factions. In their mind, they are not tied down to nations but were citizens of the world. The Russian Revolution did not solely happen because peasants raised their sickles against the Tsar. Their course was partially finally sponsored by German bankers who wanted the Russians to be weak to defeat them. The Americans brought in aid under the guise humanitarian effort through the Red Cross to fund rebels. The financiers sponsored Trotsky, the Menshevik and even the Bolshevik to cripple the Russians. The sinking of Lusitania by the German U-boats marked the entry of the USA into World War 1. It was no mere coincidence that the cruise ship was hit. It entailed an elaborate plan of the bankers' interference in intercepting newspaper advertisement, false declaration of goods and blocking of navy communications.

As known to us, FRS through their lackeys, the World Bank and IMF, are quick to write off loans of despotic third world regimes by giving them more notable credits with a more extended tenure of repayment to make these countries eternally in debt. The biggest losers are the citizens who become debtors for generations altogether.

Loyalty is an alien to the bankers. Money, business, wealth and power is all that matters. The strategy of putting up a two-faced appearance go on all through time. They were around at the time when Germany was gung-ho in arming themselves to the teeth and going gangbuster into industrialisation. At a time midway through World War 2, they syphoned off legally gold to Europe to improve their economy. They support dictators in the modern era.

The Federal Reserve System has grown too large for comfort. The author proposes that it should be abolished as it runs like a cartel working against the public interest, advocating extreme usury, generates unfair tax, destabilises the economy, encourages war and is an instrument of totalitarianism.

The Seven Members of Jekyll Island


A satirical cartoon of 1848 depicts "Rothschild" pondering over which of Europe's rulers to favour with loans, while revolutionaries challenge the ancient order he is supporting.

Tuesday, 1 May 2018

It is about self respect!

English Vinglish (2012)


The story reminds me of one of Gandhi's prophetic words. Be the change you want the world to be. Rather than demanding for the respect that you think you deserve and being all uptight about it, it makes more sense to earn it the hard but formidable old-fashioned way - you develop it and let the world decide whether you deserve that admiration.

Gone are the days when, by virtue of birth and social standing, one can garner unquestioned loyalty and esteem. In real life, the weaker ones in society are just trampled upon and ridiculed to falsely give the aggressors their own self-worth.

I think this quintessentially Indian message is subtly inserted into the story of a timid Bombay housewife who gets the opportunity to visit the Big Apple for her niece's wedding.

Doing all the chores that are expected of her as a mother, wife and a doting daughter-in-law, she ignores the abuses and ridicules hurled at her, in her face and behind her back, for her lack in proficiency in the English Language.

As fate has it, she lands in New York alone. An ugly incident at a café makes her secretly enrol in an English class. The rest of the film is her adventure with her classmates in a somewhat knock-off classroom of 'Mind Your Language' with a dedicated teacher in the vein of Mr Brown. Predictably, in the end, in the typical fashion of Bollywood, amidst the trials and tribulations with an Indian wedding in the backdrop, she impresses her family with self-confidence and an impromptu speech in English.



Sridevi, who is dubbed as the Indian Meryl Streep and the female Rajnikanth in Japan, makes a comeback to the silver screen after a 15-year hiatus in this morale-boosting flick. The rush to learn English, especially amongst girls, apparently skyrocketed after this film. This film was nominated for the Academy Award under the Best Foreign Language Film category.

In a scene in which the protagonist is hackled for her heavily accented pronunciation of the word 'jazz' which sounded like 'jhaaz', I was reminded of a moment with my daughter. Always a stickler for the idea that a foreign word should be pronounced like the native speakers do, she goes to great lengths to correct her family members' intonation. [Parmesson ~ paːmɪˈzan; Crème brûlée ~krɛM bruːˈleɪ]. In her mind, having more than one way to pronounce a word is a mortal sin.

The message in this offering can be a wake-up call to a certain population in this country who constantly wash dirty linen in public and blame all their social woes to their political leaders' action and inactions. We make the man we want to be. It may be easy for abled bodies like us to preach, but then, nothing in this world is nearly as impossible. People have climbed Everest with artificial limbs! Need I say more?

Memorable quote:

“When a man cooks, it’s an art. When a woman cooks, it’s just her duty.”

Creative Commons License

Sunday, 29 April 2018

Parallels we have seen before!

The symbolic crossing of the 38th parallel
The leaders of the Koreas cajoling each other
to cross the coveted line. ©FG
The world is pleased with the symbolic crossing of two brothers, brothers-in-arms, who, for the good 60 over years were hawkishly looking after each other with scorn over the 38th parallel. The arbitrary line set up in a wishy-washy way in 1955 after a feud which was heading nowhere. Instigated by cheering and doomsday prophets from the world over, the siblings spotted tangential growths of gargantuan proportions, so we are made to believe.

Bear in mind, the world should not be too complacent that everything would be hunky dory from now on. Remember, the euphoria after the fall of Berlin Wall did not last enough for the world to forget the dark years of the Cold War.

Lest not we forget the generally great vibes that Neville Chamberlain got after his meeting with the soon to Führer of the Reich. And the faux pas that followed as Germany invaded Poland before the ink dried above the dotted lines.

After the Second World War, in their infant post-liberation, two metamorphosed giants of Asia, India with its struggling democracy and China with its bumbling communist dictatorship decided to prosper together in a collaboration which came to be mocked as "Hindi Chini Bhai Bhai" (India and China are brothers). Unfortunately, both nations had different notions of prosperity; India via mutual cooperation and industrialisation whilst the Middle Kingdom thought that their revolution was the answer to the world's problems.

But see what happened? Lowering their shields, Bharat soon realised that their newfound kinsmen had run over to take over part of their territory. The tension of this 1962 event lingers to date.

North Korea had always been by the world as an appendage of Red China. Is the visit to the Southern counterpart just a front for them to tone down the defence to aid the nefarious activities of their Big Brother?

Is it the lull before the storm? The settling of a storm in a teacup? Should we be worried? Well, history tells us to be.

Creative Commons License

Saturday, 28 April 2018

Time to let your mind go asunder!

Kafka in Ayodhya and other stories (2015, 2018)
Author: Zafar Anjum

Perhaps not many would appreciate the significance of the illustration of the insect to the title of this book. Of course, it is related to Franz Kafka's 1915 original novella 'Metamorphosis' where the protagonist transforms into a beetle-like insect overnight. It is a strange tale with many concealed messages and has been hailed one of the most fabulous fictions of the 20th century. It questions the purpose of our existence and our relationship with the people around us.

This potpourri of short stories immerses our thoughts into the daily lives of the characters in their contemporary Asian lives. From a journalist, Herr Kafka, who turns up around the time of the court's announcement of Ayodhya's 'Ram Mandhir- Babri Masjid' legal wrangle to a name-dropping self-proclaimed broke 'writer', there many more chronicles in this book to let your mind to go wild.

Another interesting short story is the tale of a grumpy salary earner as he goes through his routine of getting ready for work. He discovers that a rat is menacing his household. Unknown to him, the rat also has other plans. One more is a sad tale about a lonely and grouchy mother who is left behind to fend for herself as her adopted-daughter and her son stays overseas. There is also a dark tale of a soon-to-be-married Hanuman devotee who suffers from erectile dysfunction. Imagine the words that you write revolt against the writer for scripting them in a bad light.

Two other narrations bring experiences outside India. A sister cannot accept the death of her brother after being gunned down by an Israeli soldier. The grand finale tells about an Indian businessman who comes to Singapore for a weekend rendezvous ends up heartbroken as his confession of love to an immigrant social escort is rejected!

An excellent and easy read. In this world where communicating with fellow human beings becomes increasingly more difficult where political correctness and care not to offend has reached absurd levels, fictions remain a safe, harmless outlet. One can create his own world where his heroes can comprise of himself and the people he likes, and the evil demons can be all the annoying species that he meets in his worldly life!


Creative Commons License

Thursday, 26 April 2018

A number is just a number. Or is it?

The Number 23 (2007)

I did wonder once why the seed of humanity is intertwined around an unusual number, 23; a prime number. [Refer] It could easily be centred around an even number or one around the most mysterious figures known to Man, i.e. nine. But it had to be 23. A funny number. Obscure or intentional?

Actually, if we look around us, the number 23 appears more often than we realise. The enigmatic constant manifests as Avogadro's expression of 6 X 1023  is the number of atoms in a mole of a substance. The Quran's first verse was told on the 23rd day of the ninth month, and it took 23 years to be fully revealed. Julius Caesar was stabbed 23 times; Brutus' twenty-third one proving fatal after saying Et Tu, Brute?' Then there is the superstitious belief of 'enigma 23' where bad things can happen around number 23.

I thought Jim Carrey acted very well in this thriller. He portrays the role of a disturbed city dog catcher who believes that the author of an obscure book is trying to convey a cryptic message to him using the number 23. Suddenly he sees everything with the cursed number association. His obsession with this 'most paranoid' number reveals much more than meets the eye.

The element of confusion, whodunit and surprise is nicely embedded in this flick. Unfortunately, the general public thought that the story was too convoluted for general consumption. It only managed a measly 8% on the Rotten Tomatoes' scale, and Carrey was the runners-up to the Raspberry award that year (losing to Eddie Murphy for 'Norbit').

I thought that it came with a few memorable lines. It may appear cliche to some.

  • There's no such thing as destiny. There are only different choices. Some choices are easy, some aren't. Those are the really important ones, the ones that define us as people.
  • To die there in the street would have been easy. But it wouldn't have been justice, at least not the justice fathers teach their sons about. I'll be sentenced in a week or so. My lawyer says the judge will look kindly upon me for turning myself in. Maybe it's not the happiest of endings, but it's the right one. Someday I'll be up for parole, and we can go on living our lives. It's only a matter of time. Of course, time is just a counting system — numbers with meaning attached to them — isn't it?
  • I'd like two words on my tombstone: what if.
  • Time is just a counting system with numbers attached to it.

P.S. Just learnt a new word. 'Graphomania' (or scribomania) is the obsessive impulse to write. It is a psychiatric condition when it degenerates into contradictory statements or meaningless rumblings. It then is defined as 'graphorrhoea'. Sometimes I wonder if I had crossed the imaginary boundary.

Creative Commons License

Wednesday, 25 April 2018

Don't mix facts with truth!

Their Finest (2016)

Unlike movies like 'Dunkirk' and 'Darkest Hour' that looks at a macro level, at the decisions and moves made at a higher level, this British film looks at it from a somewhat different angle. It reveals two things, as I see it; how the war affects the little man in the streets of London and how the spin doctors bend the truth to give a more grandiose picture to suit their agendas. Somehow, in the name of nationalism and duality of nature of things, we always see ourselves as the aggrieved but the righteous one.

Is it just me or do I see more and more flicks where the female, in many recently released movies, play a more dominant and composed role? Their male counterparts are made to appear weak and fickle. 

Catherine Cole, a Welsh lady, starts work with Ministry of Information to make documentaries to boost the morale of the public during the trying times of World War 2 as the UK is under attack by the German forces. She hears about a pair of twins allegedly sailing to Dunkirk. The story goes on to show the falsity of the story and how the whole team turned into a movie, inserting elements to satisfy various quarters and sentiments. The people struggle through the inconveniences of sudden disruptions of daily lives and inability to enjoy their sumptuous meals. The lives of the members of the fairer sex were destined to change forever by the war. As their males counterparts had marched to war, the ladies had to fill the vacuum left by their exodus. The War must have ejected the dames from their comfort zones behind their apron to flood the job market and demand for women empowerment. 

This flick also drove home the point that when a story is based on a true story, it just means that it is loosely associated with it. Along the screenplay, the directing, satisfying the producers and the distributors, many things must have changed and edited a million times to make the whole presentation appear appealing, larger than life, sexy, sellable, screen-worthy and politically correct.
Creative Commons License

Tuesday, 24 April 2018

Cast in stone or mere sculpturing?

Cast in stone at a local temple for all to see.

At one look, this passage, probably from the scriptures of Manu, must be the most patriarchal statement ever. This marble slab is plastered on the walls of a local Hindu temple. It is proudly placed amongst the many meaningful verses from the Gita. I wonder if anyone takes time to read it, understand its message. If they did, I wonder if they would state their dissatisfaction. Or perhaps request for other more appropriate messages in keeping with the demand of time, space and societal sensitivity! These words may have carried relevance in a different era and in a distinct community milieu. 

One would say that it is cherry-picking if certain parts of the scriptures are blanked out and the ones meeting our agenda are picked up. All words of wisdom should stand the test of time. It should be relevant to the end of times. 

This trend of discussion is nothing new. Even during so-called 'Golden Age of the Islamic civilisation', such discourse apparently took place between the members of the Mu'tazila and Ash'ariyya schools of theology. On the Mu'tazilite end, they argued that the scriptures must only be a guide but the  God-given thinking faculty should prevail above all. Their detractors insisted that the divine inscriptions are beyond perfect. There was no place for human analysis.

I think most of the world problems involving religions are due to a literal translation of the text. No exemption is given to the circumstance it was mentioned. Everyone finds it more comfortable to say their peace, retreat into a cocoon and blame the divine forces if malady should strike. They have no guilt feeling and feel justified even if tragedies are associated with their actions or inactions. The silent God takes the blame.




Don't talk to strangers?