Contestants: Vartika Singh (India), Mohana Prabha (Singapore),
Mehr Elieser (Panama), Priya Serrao (Australia),
Shweta Sekhon (Malaysia). |
On one end, they want to be assessed on their mental ability and tenacity. They feel slighted when referred to as the weaker sex or given leeway for under achievements. They would like to believe that their successes in life were purely via merit, not by merely being the fairer sex. They raise their gaze when the female gender is condescended upon or depicted in a negative light.
But it is quite puzzling that the parading of scantily clad females like livestock raises no concern at all to them. Sure, intellectual capacity, wit, personality and social consciousness all are tested to pick the fairest of them all. Physical attributes must surely give the window of opportunity for other subsequent successes to follow soon.
Have we not seen enough instances of how beauty queens being puppets of businesses and government acting under the guise of being a brand ambassador for a novel cause?
![]() |
Ms Reita Faria, Ms World 1966. |

Have you noticed that over the years how the selection of finalists is overtly biased toward the turn of events in the world political arena? And more contestants from the developing countries seem to capture the limelight. Probably that is where the target audience is and where the sponsors want to tap their resources from. Maybe their counterparts in the first world are over with burning bras and have nothing more to prove. They are more than mere eye candies or trophy toys to demand recognition. Points to ponder.
So beautiful
ReplyDeletePranita, the article, the candidates or Ms Reita Faria?
Delete