Showing posts with label al-andalus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label al-andalus. Show all posts

Friday, 12 October 2018

Córdoba's Mesquita

One of the sites that should not miss if you happen to be around the Spanish ring is Córdoba. The one place that defines Córdoba is the Mosque-Cathedral of Córdoba (@Mezquita) and its Bell Tower. Most of it early history is only through oral tradition. Very little is actually known about its origin. Legends say that it started as a small church dedicated to their patron saint St Vincent during the Visigoth era. Emir Abdul-al-Rahman I from the Ummayad kingdom who conquered the Iberian peninsula actually shared part of the building for the Muslim worshippers. He later bought over the rest of the erection and started construction of a grand mosque.

The result is a majestic building which boasts of the splendour of incorporation of Roman columns, Goth architecture, Renaissance and Caliphal designs all into one. This historic site has gained UNESCO World Heritage status.
In its pre-Reconquista heydays, it used to be a medical and educational hub as well as a place of silk production. 


At the entry of the Mosque-Cathedral. Note the Roman styled bridge over Guadalquivir ©FG
The entrance ©FG

©FG

The characteristic Roman arches with maroon-beige striation for which the Mosque-Cathedral is known for. ©FG

©FG

©FG

©FG

Mihrab (directed toward Mecca) ©FG

The intricate Cathedral ceiling quite advanced for its age. ©FG

The Chapel ©FG

The Bell Tower formerly was a minaret for the mosque. ©FG

N.B. With all the globalisation and borderless world concept, it was no surprise that besides the usual tapas and paella, that óne of the best briyani can be tasted in a small restaurant in the narrow streets of Cōrdoba manned by a Pakistani immigrant. Trust TripAdvisor to pick it out!



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Wednesday, 10 October 2018

Rewriting history?

Dedicated to Nadia Murad, a survivor of sexual violence by the Islamic State. 2018 Nobel Prize for Peace.

Warning: For mature readers only. 
Discretion advised.

The Impact of Islam (2014)
Author: Emmet Scott

My Muslim friends would not like the contents of this book. In the same vein as Darío Fernández-Morera's  'The Myth of Andalusia', the author tries to rewrite world history as we know it. 

The world talks about the Golden Age of Islam of a time when the areas administered by the Muslims were at the epitome of culture and Arab was the lingua franca whilst Europe was in the Dark Ages. The truth, according is from the truth. In fact, it is just the opposite.

The region of the Golden Era, Spain, has been having its own development towards the tail end of the Roman Empire. The Visigoths showed the building prowess constructing large churches with intricate designs. The art of distillation, advances in Mathematics (algebra, number zero and trigonometry), paper printing, silk and gunpowder which are traditionally credited to the Muslims are not indeed their discoveries. Distillation has its roots in Babylonia. Mathematics developed in India and the Chinese are credited for the rest. The Arab contributed nothing. They were barbaric illiterate brash horsemen who were only keen on plundering and destroying anything in their path. Many of peaceful reign and so-called atmosphere for culture were made by non-Arabic converts from Persia, Turks and Mongols. The Arab language commonly used did not mean that they were Arabs by race.

The invaders perhaps helped in the dissemination of knowledge from one part of the world to another, but it was waiting to happen anyway, with or without their intervention. True, the religion promised justice to many underprivileged members at that time, but three members of the society were still marginalised- women and boys, slaves and non-Muslims (kefir). 

Slave trade was on a downward trend by the 8th century when Christianity in Europe started talking about equality and human rights. But the Muslim conquerors reignited this trade and made slavery a lucrative market. In fact, the demand for white-skinned slaves drew the Vikings to capture North Europeans. Berber pirates were also active in the high seas to capture European merchant ships and to sell off the crew as white slaves.

In Europe, the Renaissance happened way before the often perceived 14th - 16th centuries. The Benedictine monks worked hard at improving agricultural yields, windmill technology, animal domestication, use of collars that aid use of horses for ploughing and more. Scholastic studies continued. Healing of the sick via plant-based medication and the establishment of hospitals were initialised.  

Maybe unfairly, the author accuses the Muslim conquerors, from Abd' er Rahman (756AD) onwards to have set the brutal standards upon which future wars were to be fought. In this way, he justifies the brutality shown by the Spanish Conquistadores on the South Americans and the Crusaders upon their enemies.  

Describing Jews as 'The People of the Book' and enjoyed cordial relations with the invaders is a creative fiction. Animosity between the Muslims and the Jews go back to the time of the prophet. Collection of jiziya from non-believers was big business, and the Almohads and the Almoravids, Muslim armies from North Africa found out the hard way that enormous destruction on the Christian and Jewish stronghold was counter-productive as loss of revenues was quite debilitating. They also realised that mass conversion was self-defeating even though the urge to create Darul Islam was overwhelming. 

The prosecution of Jews is said to have been initiated in Cordoba and Granada under the watchful eyes of their Muslim conquerors. This is supposed to be the blueprint for other similar aggression against the Jews including the ones conducted by Christian mobs in Rhineland and the rest of Europe. The idea of violence in the name of Christ started here. Indirectly, Mahmud of Ghazni's invasion of India is the genesis of militant Hindus in centuries to come!

The most brutal part of the book must surely be the appendix which gives the final blow to Islam. It questions the existence of Prophet Muhammad and accuses Muslim Arabs as merely a Christian sect called Ebionites who revere the teachings of Moses but not accepting Jesus as the son of God. The Ebonites or Arab Christians, with their Proto-Islam, managed to impress the Sassanids who embraced their belief. The original Quran was apparently written in Syriac script, hence the confusion about 72 virgins and 72 grapes in paradise. Muhammad, as mentioned in the holy scriptures, are no other than that of Jesus. The Quran is a Christian text and corruption in the language and confusion between Joshua and Jesus led to this problem. 

Quite a controversial book, this one. Unlike the believers who think that the religion is all-encompassing able to stand the test time, it compares Islam to many of the failed political ideologies that the world has seen. Like communism, despotism and fascism which clamours of a fabled time of past glory and a utopia of rainbows and unicorns, it accuses its followers of imagining a fictitious past that never existed. In the same modus operandi as Pol Pot and his Khmer Rouge regime, they wish to rewrite human history and start with Year Zero. 

Wednesday, 21 June 2017

Just to burst your bubble!

The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise
Muslims, Christians and Jews under Islamic Rule in Medieval Spain
Darío Fernández-Morera (2016)

My understanding is that Islam experienced its zenith of growth in Andalusia (Al-Andalus, Islamic Spain). It was the time of the golden age of Islam where everyone lived happily, believers and non-believers alike. I thought Jews and Christians lived in harmony in mutual respect as the 'people of the book'.

But, wait! This book by a contemporary historian will burst that bubble. Darío, armed with archaeological evidence from scripts written in Spanish and other European languages, has set a 200-pages bibliography to showcase the extent of his research. He claims to have access to scripts of Christians who fled the tyranny of the marauding Berber horsemen.

He describes our present knowledge of Andalusia akin to learning about America from the life and times of Hollywood actors or about the Arabs from the Saudi royal family. The real situation on the ground comes from the narration of the day to day living of the ordinary subjects living under the Empire, not from scripts written by salaried scribes.

Islamists claim that their religion is one of peace. Their influence beyond their land was via natural expansion, migratory wave, not military expansion. Paradoxically, the author asserts that was not the order of the day. Berbers and mercenaries from Northern Africa were brutal soldiers who went for blood. They had their own code of battle ethics. Following the Maliki school of thoughts, they ensured that men of the conquered land were killed, decapitated and impaled to set as a warning to others. Women and children were enslaved. They had comprehensive rules on keeping sex slaves and the outcome of such union.

Before Southern Spain was conquered, it was under the Visigoth-Catholic-Roman rule. Contrary to popular belief, Europe was not in dark ages but had a semblance of culture. The Roman culture, architecture and way of living had seeped into this area. The Arabs and the Berbers who invaded these areas by of low culture, as described by historian Al Khaldun. These barbarians were happy pulverising buildings to the ground and erecting their places of worship atop pre-existing churches. Their own architectural skills were appalling and their erections were of low quality and would crumble easily.

Just like the present time when the US wants to attack a country, it forms an alliance with a discontented group within a country. To attack Iraq, it cooperates with Saddam's enemies within the country. The Islamic invaders did the same. The Jews, who were unhappy under the Visigoth Christian rule, were treated with disdain for punishing their son of God, Jesus Christ. The Jews were temporarily given special privileges when the Muslims won. Unfortunately, it did not last long. The Muslims remembered a verse in the Quran (5:51) that Jews could never be their allies and would always be their servant! Under the Islamic rule with Maliki form of jurisprudence, they were also ostracised. Many Jews cooperated with the rulers of the day, held high positions in the government and contributed to the day to day running of the province. Some converted to Islam to avoid being humiliated, paying jizya (tax for non-Muslims, dhimmis) while others stayed as closet Jews. Despite all these restrictions, the region experienced the Hebrew Golden Age. Leaders like Maimonides, who played both sides, pleased their political masters whilst holding a tight rein on worship. The erection of synagogues was not allowed and Jews had to wear identification tags.

The Christians to were also treated as second class citizens. Andalus was governed by a system of hierocracy, not democracy, and laws were dictated by a government of clerics. Canon Law and Civil Law which were initiated by the Roman Catholic churches went out of the window. Separation of religion and law was something foreign. They were not allowed to openly display their symbol of worship or to celebrate festivities. During the time of the invasion, many grand churches were converted to mosques.

The drinking well used by them was considered impure for consumption of the Muslims. In the day to day living, the Christians were made to feel unwelcome. Some migrated up to Northern Spain with their scrolls and treasures. Some converted and re-converted to their old religion after the Spanish Inquisition by Queen Isabella.

The author asserts that there was no 'Golden Age' during this era. This area in Spain was cultured by the Visigoth kingdom who looked at the Romans for inspiration. The development happened not because of the Muslim invaders but despite their marauding. If not for their intrusion, he emphasises that they would have reached even greater heights.

There was never a time of co-existence amongst the people of Andalusia. It was always a master and slave relationship. The masters went around with a chip on their shoulders with the conviction that they were chosen to spread Allah's message of peace and brotherhood. It was all Machiavellian politics, not Panglossian. With their twisted Maliki philosophy, they felt justified to wage a holy war once a year, at least.

The grandiosity of Andalus is not of the invaders' doings. They just imported knowledge wholesale and labelled it as theirs. From Persia and the Sassanids came administrative skills. The sciences were translated from Greek to Syriac to Arabic by people already in the kingdom. Mathematics and algorithm originated from India. The so-called Islamic 'universities' were nothing more than madrasahs to learn religion. Researching into science and mathematics was considered unholy. Music and art were discouraged as any representations of living things were deemed as mocking the Almighty. Music and wine were intoxicants that were frowned upon. Poetry, however, was considered harmless. Even women recited poems behind the shield of a curtain and veil.

The quite disturbing form of business which was thriving in Al-Andalus was slave trade. As the spoils of their war increased, so did their herd of slaves as the soldiers had a practice of killing all men and sparing children and women. The slaves were sanctioned by the rulers to be used as sex slaves, abused and traded as sex slaves. Offspring from this union became de-facto Muslims and enjoy all rights of a Muslim. The worst of in this society seem to the mohsanas (Muslim wives). They were expected to carry their duties (as for procreation, home duties and caring for the young ones), hence could not be seen in public or be engaged in recreational activities. In that aspect, female slaves had more rights. They could improve themselves by singing and dancing to make themselves more marketable!

With such impressive references, it is now the duty of academics to peruse the author's research and challenge his assertions. He posits that the wrongful representation of history was done because of apparent hostility against the Christians. They are accused of being the reason for fall of the Roman Empire. So, to denigrate their prowess, the Muslim conquerors instead were put on a pedestal!

At the present state of world affairs, nothing is going to come out of this single publication. Even if there is any truth in any of these, it is unlikely that those who reminisce the good old glory of Islam where Al-Andalus was a beacon of enlightenment and a place where 'peoples of the Book' allegedly lived in harmony as equals! Cognitive dissonance would come in the way!

“Be afraid. Be very afraid.”*