Article 26 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights promises free education to all, at least in the elementary stages. It should be equally accessible to all, and parents have the right to choose the kind of education given to their children. Sounds nice on paper, but in reality, this is far from the truth.
It is not a level playing field. How often have we heard of bright students missing opportunities because of their social class, race or simply not knowing the 'right people'? Conversely, so many are elevated way beyond their capabilities because of affirmative actions. Some scaled greater heights as their parents are capable of using their influence or wealth to beat the system or use backdoor means to achieve what they cannot possibly do in a fair game.
The world is not fair. The democratisation of education is only a smokescreen. In reality, it is controlled by the elitist. Schools in the developed part of the countries have better facilities and full-strength teaching force. Students in poor areas have to make do with suboptimal learning conditions. Private schools are paid for by the affluent, and government boarding schools get the undivided attention of rulers as it houses the kids of the elites and students to fit a specific agenda.
Everyone has wised up to appreciate the importance of education. And they all want a piece of the action. The under-privileged use academic excellence as their ticket to extrude themselves from the shackles of poverty. And do not be surprised if they fight for the passport with tooth and nail.
The movie, Serious Men, is a satirical look at the hypocrisy of the society that talks about equality and social justice. In reality, however, everyone is just happy with the status quo. Each uses each other to suppress the one below them, keep them ignorant but instead use the other to springboard themselves to greater heights. The ignorance of the under-class is ridiculed, but the follies by the elites are swept under the carpet.
Like the colonial masters who thought that civilising the natives was the white man's burden, the elitists class believe that they are indeed torchbearers for marginalised. The politicians, on the other hand, make a fool of everyone for their own vested interest.
Ayyan Mani, the protagonist, is a personal assistant to a renowned space scientist. Extricating himself from extreme poverty via education, Ayyan tries to provide the best that education can offer to enjoy the fruit of scholarship. To his disappointment, he meets resistance at all ends. To top it up, his son is a slow learner with hearing impairment. Ayyan concocts a scheme to make his son appear a genius.
This offering ends up as a thought-provoking one. It sneers at our social web and the game that we play to achieve our private intentions. It is well crafted and does not paint the melancholia of poverty, but instead, people in the film have accepted their karmic cycle and carry on with their lives.
Comments
Post a Comment