Skip to main content

You decide as you go on...

Waiting (Hinglish, 2016)


We all think we know what is right for us, for our better halves. We think we know what the other would prefer if they are not in a position to choose and we have it to pick for them. This is especially so when it comes to matters of life and death. As if we talk about the types of morbid subjects, e.g. "Would you want we pull the plug if you were a vegetable?"

Do we have all the answers for situations in our lives? Is there an algorithm or a flow-chart for all eventualities that are spewed upon us? Do you know that the decision we are making is indeed the right one?

That is the premise of this story. A newly married metropolitan lady receives news that her husband was involved in a serious road traffic accident in another town. Rushing there, she finds him to be comatose with severe head injury. Whilst immersed in grief, the denial, accusation and all, she bumps into a retired Professor who has been coping with the unsettling condition of his wife who had been in a coma for eight months. It tells how the younger learns to deal with the crisis. The film explores the inter-generational gap, their social interaction and how the people around them and easy availability of information make decision-making so tricky. Anecdotal findings in the medical journal only confuse the issues further. There is also displacement of anger by bashing the medical fraternity and globalisation, vilification of corporations and insurance companies as well as social media and human behaviour. It is not, however, just a catarrh of nihilism.

Life is a journey. We sail through, sometimes punctuated by unplanned setbacks. We wait and ruminate for every situation is unique. Perhaps, life would be less stressful if we let others decide for us. The pressure of burden would be less on us. Or let God's will follow its intended course and just procrastinate?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gory historic details or gore fest?

Razakar:  The Silent Genocide Of Hyderabad  (Telegu, 2024) Director:  Yata Satyanarayana In her last major speech before her disposition, Sheikh Hasina accused those who opposed her rule in Bangladesh of being Razakars. The opposition took offence to this term and soon widespread mob throughout the land. Of course, it is not that that single incident brought down an elected government but a culmination of joblessness and unjust reservations for a select population group. In the Bengali psyche, Razakar is a pejorative term meaning traitor or Judas. It was first used during the 1971 Pakistan Civil War. The paramilitary group who were against the then-East Pakistani leader, Majibur Rehman, were pro-West Pakistan. After establishing independence in Bangladesh, Razakars were disbanded, and many ran off to Pakistan. Around the time of Indian independence, turmoil brewed in the princely state of Hyderabad, which had been a province deputed by the Mughals from 1794. The rule of N...

The products of a romantic star of the yesteryear!

Now you see all the children of Gemini Ganesan (of four wives, at least) posing gleefully for the camera after coming from different corners of the world to see the ailing father on his deathbed. They seem to found peace with the contributor of their half of their 46 chromosomes. Sure, growing up must have been hell seeing their respective mothers shedding tears, indulgence in unhealthy activities with one of them falling prey to the curse of the black dog, hating the sight of each step sibling, their respective heartaches all because of the evil done by one man who could not put his raging testesterones under check! Perhaps,the flashing lights and his dizzying heights that his career took clouded his judgement. After all, he was only human... Gems of Gemini Ganesan L-R: Dr Revathi Swaminathan, Narayani Ganesan, Dr Kamala Selvaraj, Rekha, Vijaya Chamundeswari   and Dr Jaya Shreedhar.  ( Abs:  Radha Usman Syed, Sathish Kumaar Ganesan) Seeing six of Ge...

Chicken's Invite? (Ajak-ajak ayam)

In the Malay lingo, the phrase 'ajak-ajak ayam' refers to an insincere invitation. Of course, many of us invite for courtesy's sake, but then the invitee may think that the invitation is for real! How does anyone know? Inviters and invitees must be smart enough to take the cue that one party may have gatecrashed with ulterior motives, or the other may not want him to join in the first place! Easily twenty years ago, my family was invited to a toddler's birthday party. As my children were toddlers, too, we were requested to come early so that my kids could run around and play in their big compound. And that the host said she would arrange a series of games for them to enjoy. So there we were in the early evening at a house that resembled very little of one immersed in joy and celebration. Instead, we were greeted by a house devoid of activities and no guests. The host was still out shopping her last-minute list, and her helper was knee-deep in her preparations to ...