RIFLE RANGE BOY: night school

Law: Freedom trap?

Heard over the weekend, a public forum, in the ambience of a multi-storey departmental, the epitome of the success of capitalism, of a topic highlighting things that mattered to the lowly common folks of the country- the law and whether it was the best thing available for the common man on the street. The forum forms part of the series of BFM Night School's outdoor activity, bringing intellectual and philosophical discussions to the masses.
With the advent and selective use of law by leaders, of late, to subdue their political opponents and even curb the supposed freedom of his subjects, this topic appears more relevant than ever, today. Whenever common sense fail to rule, the long arm of the law is conveniently invoked to scare the living daylights of its victim (lay people). The law sometimes seem not accessible to the common man as compared to people in power. Law seem to take more time than the process of governing the country. Even though avenues are available for fair representation and trial, the process appears to be going at snail's pace. At the end of the day, it looks like there is no justice in courts.
In the beginning of time, citizens agreed that things need to be done in a certain manner. He sacrificed a part of his freedom and traded it in for peace on earth. That was acceptable as law. Human beings, being left to his instincts would do whatever he feels, sometimes at a primal level. So, people have bargained with the state to let go a bit of their 'freedom' to be ruled (trapped). All in the name of peace and order so that all beings can like happily, each getting their place in the sun.
Looking at things now, rather than law helping to set order, it seems that the law is used to cause disorder.
Human rights denotes what a human being can rightfully do. It does not make sense that a law has to be meted to say what a human can do or rather teaching a human how to live. As if human beings never lived before 1948. Maybe there is something wrong in the mindset of human being himself if he does not know how a human should live.

Take for example, a primitive society in the fringe of modern city may be quite contented with their local law which may appear so-stone aged to an average modern man. Capital punishment and amputations may have been accepted as a just punishment to be meted. Can we say that that society in their own laws?
At the end of the day, man makes law to put things in order but some how feels trapped when the law he creates is used to trap into submission to satisfy certain higher orders.

Coming from a background of science where things are more objective, where a spade is called a spade, I am slowly trying to build the right side of the brain with reasoning and creativity. Culture and logic, I found out of late, is very subjective and can be argued all through the country side till the cows come home.

My quest to acquire knowledge landed me in the company of intellectuals and those who thought of themselves as one on a Sunday noon in the heart of town.
Yes, BFM Night School had their first live show! In a hall in Annex Gallery in the vicinity of Central Market, 5 intellectuals gathered to lead a discussion to theorise the troubles that are slowly brewing in Malaysia. I was particularly impressed with how the panel members approached the title. At one look, it looks all Greek to me but they managed to dissect the troubles simmering in the country from a few angles. Ahmad Fuad Rahmat (of Islamic Renaissance Front) and Sharrad Kuttan (of BFM) acted as moderators.
Boon Kia Meng, the renowned documentary maker whose recent flick on the housing problems faced by the younger generation which had won international accolades, started the ball rolling talking about inequalities in society especially the widening gap between the haves and have nots. Even though his arguments may suggest that he may be a communist, he categorically denied that he is a Marxist. But then Karl Marx himself was also quoted as saying that he was not a Marxist! The level of corruption and the bludgeoning cost of living seem like a perfect recipe for a crisis in Malaysia.

The second speaker, Shahril Sufian Hamdan, highlighted on race relation in the country. He gave hope that the newer generation seem to on the right track to be colour blind to different races in the country. He was optimistic that unlike their predecessors, the youngsters do not compartmentalize people by race. Personally, I think it is just wishful thinking. The scene on the ground is far from this. Daily frustrations of discrimination of government policies felt by the younger generations are only brewing more trouble despite what the leaders want us to believe.
The third speaker, albeit being controversial, was interesting, to say the least. He managed to argue his case of the romanticising the region's philosophical past to justify the acceptance of the Malay Language as the lingua franca of the region and revamping the education system to attain national unity. Muhiyuddin Al-attas, reiterated that South East Asia (especially the Malay Archipelago) was a peaceful region with a highly developed education system which included philosophy, theology and higher studies. With the invasion of Western cultures and way of thinking, our original education had lost out and took a back seat. His outlook is that, we the Western educated, failed to see the superiority of the old holistic education system.
More interesting discussions took place as questions were opened to the floor. Only then did I realise that looks can be deceptive. Despite their simple appearances and non-fancy attires, I was in the company very learned, cultured and articulate individuals. They seem to have been around the world and could put forth their ideas in a well constructed sentences and excellent choices of words.

One interesting topic that came about is the topic of unity of a nation through uncommon binding factors. Our struggle to unify the nation via a common language appears like we are barking up the wrong tree when we see the Swiss unite strongly despite having 3 national languages. Another audience, rebutted that the common denominator in the Swiss experience is religion.
In another discussion, the floor was made to realise that most countries around the world are guilty of prosecuting their minorities in spite of their seemingly homogeneously peaceful acceptance of all citizens.
I gather that history should be learnt and left as it is. We should try to re-live or reenact the 'glorious'past. History has shown again and again that treading along these lines can be dangerous. Hitler tried to romanticize his superior race and met a devastating end, creating a mayhem along the way. The Hindus in India were unanswerable to the meaningless blood shed arising from the destruction of rival house of worship as that spot was their holy spot earlier! Changes on earth are layered just like the magma of volcanic spill that is laid over time. We should be able to accept it.
The hall swelled up with audience as the forum progressed and arguments heated up. The intellect of the audience really showed when questions deemed sensitive by Malaysian standards were discussed in a level headed critical fashion, not by emotion or blind obedience.
As in all intellectual talks, the audience yearned for more, knowing well that all these were talk. Change must come and will come from the masses. Unfortunately, human emotions and loyalty played by leaders determines the path of the nation. Logic and justice has nothing to do with it!