Skip to main content

The dark world of boxing

Body and Soul (1947)

Before there was Raging Bull, Champ and Rocky series, there was 'Body and Soul'. It was played fantastically by John Garfield, the darling of the noirs and the pioneer of anti-heroes.
Besides Garfield's acting, the film is also commendable for its then advanced technique of filming of a live event, which set the mood well for the final clash.
We get a glimpse of William Conrad, who used to be famous in Malaysian TV in the 70s for the fat PI 'Cannon' and 'Jake and the Fatman' in the 90s, here thinner.
Even though the movie appears to be depicting the evils of the world of boxing, betting and how it is controlled by the mob, deep below the surface, it takes a swipe at the evils of capitalism. It shows how the lure of money clouds the mind of the young who feels that acquiring wealth is testimony of doing well in life. One fails to see the devastation done in the process of doing so, the heartaches, the broken hearts and morality lost.
In fact, most of those involved in the production of this movie, Garfield, wife, screenwriter and director were all later hurled by the US Government for suspected communists activities during the McCarthy era.
A young pugilist gets a deal to show his boxing skills. Along the way, when he was a small guy, he had his mother, his best buddy and his girl. As he climbed the ladder of success which was actually paved by a group of apparently good intentioned individuals, so he thinks, he loses his friendship, his love and self respect. He hangs around characters who are only eyeing his money and their share of their loot as he wins more and more matches. He even has to throw away fights so that mob can earn some money.
As in any good movie, the hero comes to his senses. He realises that there is more things at stake when you give away fights - your dignity, pride and the hope of all who look up at you, not just the prize money!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gory historic details or gore fest?

Razakar:  The Silent Genocide Of Hyderabad  (Telegu, 2024) Director:  Yata Satyanarayana In her last major speech before her disposition, Sheikh Hasina accused those who opposed her rule in Bangladesh of being Razakars. The opposition took offence to this term and soon widespread mob throughout the land. Of course, it is not that that single incident brought down an elected government but a culmination of joblessness and unjust reservations for a select population group. In the Bengali psyche, Razakar is a pejorative term meaning traitor or Judas. It was first used during the 1971 Pakistan Civil War. The paramilitary group who were against the then-East Pakistani leader, Majibur Rehman, were pro-West Pakistan. After establishing independence in Bangladesh, Razakars were disbanded, and many ran off to Pakistan. Around the time of Indian independence, turmoil brewed in the princely state of Hyderabad, which had been a province deputed by the Mughals from 1794. The rule of N...

The products of a romantic star of the yesteryear!

Now you see all the children of Gemini Ganesan (of four wives, at least) posing gleefully for the camera after coming from different corners of the world to see the ailing father on his deathbed. They seem to found peace with the contributor of their half of their 46 chromosomes. Sure, growing up must have been hell seeing their respective mothers shedding tears, indulgence in unhealthy activities with one of them falling prey to the curse of the black dog, hating the sight of each step sibling, their respective heartaches all because of the evil done by one man who could not put his raging testesterones under check! Perhaps,the flashing lights and his dizzying heights that his career took clouded his judgement. After all, he was only human... Gems of Gemini Ganesan L-R: Dr Revathi Swaminathan, Narayani Ganesan, Dr Kamala Selvaraj, Rekha, Vijaya Chamundeswari   and Dr Jaya Shreedhar.  ( Abs:  Radha Usman Syed, Sathish Kumaar Ganesan) Seeing six of Ge...

Chicken's Invite? (Ajak-ajak ayam)

In the Malay lingo, the phrase 'ajak-ajak ayam' refers to an insincere invitation. Of course, many of us invite for courtesy's sake, but then the invitee may think that the invitation is for real! How does anyone know? Inviters and invitees must be smart enough to take the cue that one party may have gatecrashed with ulterior motives, or the other may not want him to join in the first place! Easily twenty years ago, my family was invited to a toddler's birthday party. As my children were toddlers, too, we were requested to come early so that my kids could run around and play in their big compound. And that the host said she would arrange a series of games for them to enjoy. So there we were in the early evening at a house that resembled very little of one immersed in joy and celebration. Instead, we were greeted by a house devoid of activities and no guests. The host was still out shopping her last-minute list, and her helper was knee-deep in her preparations to ...