Skip to main content

Banality of evil

As usual after our usual hard run on Sunday, during the breakfast of thosai, we got involved in our usual banter about events around the country.
This time around the subject was rather morbid, in particular about the death of an detainee by assault and the killing and unceremonial cremation of a millionairess recently. What makes a man do all these violent things to a fellow human being without flinching. Being a doctor, one of the group members could not stomach the idea of landing punches after punches and the coup de grace that tips the living daylights of the victim whilst looking straight into his eyes.
Unfortunately, I do not think that people of the medical profession are immune of this charge. Scores of heinous crimes against patients and even loved ones are testimony of this charge.
In fact, philosophers and psychologists have pondered upon this topic since the end of WW2. Hannah Arendt introduced the concept of banality of evil where people just did evil things that they were assigned to do without questioning and thinking of its consequence as if it was just banal (trivial) thing to do.
The abandoned 1971 Stanford prison experiment by Prof Philip Zimbaldo suggested that probably we all try to perform our roles too well. The prison guards, probably because of the absolute power given to them, act beyond the scope of their job with the aid of testesterone and ego. The prisoners go into submission because of their disadvantaged state and the stress hormones.
There must be some truth in Sigmund Freud's theory that man's needs are governed by their primodial primitive animalistic desires of food, violence and sexual gratification. Modernization and culture managed to rein these unsavoury traits which are not appropriate for living in a structured society. However, when the atmosphere is conducive or desperate, when they are amongst people of similar wavelength, these unabated evil behaviour may just be unleashed to its full glory.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gory historic details or gore fest?

Razakar:  The Silent Genocide Of Hyderabad  (Telegu, 2024) Director:  Yata Satyanarayana In her last major speech before her disposition, Sheikh Hasina accused those who opposed her rule in Bangladesh of being Razakars. The opposition took offence to this term and soon widespread mob throughout the land. Of course, it is not that that single incident brought down an elected government but a culmination of joblessness and unjust reservations for a select population group. In the Bengali psyche, Razakar is a pejorative term meaning traitor or Judas. It was first used during the 1971 Pakistan Civil War. The paramilitary group who were against the then-East Pakistani leader, Majibur Rehman, were pro-West Pakistan. After establishing independence in Bangladesh, Razakars were disbanded, and many ran off to Pakistan. Around the time of Indian independence, turmoil brewed in the princely state of Hyderabad, which had been a province deputed by the Mughals from 1794. The rule of N...

The products of a romantic star of the yesteryear!

Now you see all the children of Gemini Ganesan (of four wives, at least) posing gleefully for the camera after coming from different corners of the world to see the ailing father on his deathbed. They seem to found peace with the contributor of their half of their 46 chromosomes. Sure, growing up must have been hell seeing their respective mothers shedding tears, indulgence in unhealthy activities with one of them falling prey to the curse of the black dog, hating the sight of each step sibling, their respective heartaches all because of the evil done by one man who could not put his raging testesterones under check! Perhaps,the flashing lights and his dizzying heights that his career took clouded his judgement. After all, he was only human... Gems of Gemini Ganesan L-R: Dr Revathi Swaminathan, Narayani Ganesan, Dr Kamala Selvaraj, Rekha, Vijaya Chamundeswari   and Dr Jaya Shreedhar.  ( Abs:  Radha Usman Syed, Sathish Kumaar Ganesan) Seeing six of Ge...

Chicken's Invite? (Ajak-ajak ayam)

In the Malay lingo, the phrase 'ajak-ajak ayam' refers to an insincere invitation. Of course, many of us invite for courtesy's sake, but then the invitee may think that the invitation is for real! How does anyone know? Inviters and invitees must be smart enough to take the cue that one party may have gatecrashed with ulterior motives, or the other may not want him to join in the first place! Easily twenty years ago, my family was invited to a toddler's birthday party. As my children were toddlers, too, we were requested to come early so that my kids could run around and play in their big compound. And that the host said she would arrange a series of games for them to enjoy. So there we were in the early evening at a house that resembled very little of one immersed in joy and celebration. Instead, we were greeted by a house devoid of activities and no guests. The host was still out shopping her last-minute list, and her helper was knee-deep in her preparations to ...